[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: CVS is the `released version'
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: CVS is the `released version' |
Date: |
Sat, 19 May 2007 18:31:23 -0400 |
It is only needed for multi-file packages. Essentially package.el
needs 3 pieces of information about a package: its name, its version
number, and its requirements. For a single-file package these are
extracted from comments; package.el defines a new comment header
("Package-Requires") for requirements, but so far I think this is
unused.
For a multi-file package the problem is just knowing where to look to
get this information. It seemed simplest to have the package
maintainer provide it in a well-known place.
I think I understand. Can you show me the specs for define-package?
- Re: package.el, (continued)
- Re: package.el, David Kastrup, 2007/05/21
- Re: package.el, Tom Tromey, 2007/05/21
- Re: package.el, Davis Herring, 2007/05/21
- Re: package.el, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2007/05/21
- Re: package.el, Tom Tromey, 2007/05/25
- Re: package.el, Richard Stallman, 2007/05/26
- Re: package.el, David Reitter, 2007/05/21
- Re: package.el, Tom Tromey, 2007/05/21
- Re: package.el, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2007/05/21
- Re: package.el, Stefan Monnier, 2007/05/22
- Re: CVS is the `released version',
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: CVS is the `released version', Tom Tromey, 2007/05/19
- Re: CVS is the `released version', Richard Stallman, 2007/05/20
- Re: CVS is the `released version', Tom Tromey, 2007/05/20
- Re: CVS is the `released version', Stefan Monnier, 2007/05/21
- Re: CVS is the `released version', David Kastrup, 2007/05/21
- Re: CVS is the `released version', Stefan Monnier, 2007/05/21
- Re: CVS is the `released version', Tom Tromey, 2007/05/21
- Re: CVS is the `released version', Richard Stallman, 2007/05/22
- Re: CVS is the `released version', Trent Buck, 2007/05/22
- Re: CVS is the `released version', David Kastrup, 2007/05/22