[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: un-deprecating CL
From: |
David O'Toole |
Subject: |
Re: un-deprecating CL |
Date: |
Tue, 18 Sep 2007 19:48:55 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/23.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
> If the keyword argument handling is broken out and generalized will it
> still add much complexity?
>
> The complexity that bothers me is the complexity of the programming
> interface. This is not about implementation.
I don't understand what is complicated about the programming interface
of keyword arguments.
--
David O'Toole
address@hidden
http://dto.freeshell.org/notebook/
- Re: un-deprecating CL, (continued)
- Re: un-deprecating CL, Richard Stallman, 2007/09/16
- Re: un-deprecating CL, Joe Wells, 2007/09/16
- Re: un-deprecating CL, Richard Stallman, 2007/09/17
- Re: un-deprecating CL, David O'Toole, 2007/09/17
- Re: un-deprecating CL, Richard Stallman, 2007/09/17
- Re: un-deprecating CL, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2007/09/18
- Re: un-deprecating CL, Richard Stallman, 2007/09/18
- Re: un-deprecating CL,
David O'Toole <=
- Re: un-deprecating CL, Richard Stallman, 2007/09/19
- Re: un-deprecating CL, David O'Toole, 2007/09/19
- Re: un-deprecating CL, David O'Toole, 2007/09/17
- Re: un-deprecating CL, Richard Stallman, 2007/09/17
- Re: un-deprecating CL, Richard Stallman, 2007/09/17
- Re: un-deprecating CL, Johan Bockgård, 2007/09/18
- Re: un-deprecating CL, David O'Toole, 2007/09/16
- Re: un-deprecating CL, Richard Stallman, 2007/09/16
- Re: un-deprecating CL, David O'Toole, 2007/09/16
- Re: un-deprecating CL, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/09/16