[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like
From: |
Nick Roberts |
Subject: |
Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like |
Date: |
Sun, 6 Jan 2008 19:58:26 +1300 |
> The graphical improvements to GUD are nice, but as far as I can see, the new
> features are limited to viewing GUD data.
> The other things that could be added are being discussed, and I thought I'd
> listed a couple of possibilities.
>
> project management (files & build)
> bug tracking (see the other threads)
> task management (planner.el, todo-mode, etc.)
> code browsing (yes, it exists, but as add-ons)
> manage window configurations (Eclipse calls them perspectives)
> integrating profiling tools - and analyzing the results
>
>
> An IDE can be so much more than a debugger.
>...
If you are offering to write code to do some of these tasks that's great. If
not, then the danger of making the discussion so general is that it detracts
from the specific proposals and nothing gets done. I think the priority must
be first to use a modern bug tracker and VCS for Emacs development.
Integrating these and other features into Emacs are more substantial tasks that
can be done when volunteers are found.
--
Nick http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob
- Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like, (continued)
- Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like, Gianluca Della Vedova, 2008/01/04
- Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like, Richard Stallman, 2008/01/05
- Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like, Richard Stallman, 2008/01/06
- Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like, Trey Jackson, 2008/01/07
- Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like, Nick Roberts, 2008/01/07
- Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like, Stefan Monnier, 2008/01/07
Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like, Jari Aalto, 2008/01/19