Re: Infrastructural complexity.

[Lennart Borgman]

On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 4:21 AM, Thomas Lord<address@hidden> wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-07-17 at 03:29 +0200, Lennart Borgman wrote:
>
>> That might be a thing for the actually used user interfaces, but on
>> the devel side I see no reason to put in that restriction. Rather it
>> could be on option to set that restriction on the user side.
>
> [context: restrict or don't restrict "framelettes" to
> one level of nesting below frames, etc.]
>
> I just don't see what rules you'd reasonably
> make up for that nesting in various primitives.
> I can imagine rules that can be implemented but
> not rules that have a rationale.

I was not thinking about directly implementing them in the primitives.
Rather in the user commands.


> I'm glad you (in unquoted stuff) ack seeing my
> concern about the nesting issues and understand
> where I'm coming from with my proposal.
>
> I think my version is *probably* easier to
> implement, although that only has a loose correlation
> with "likely to be implemented sooner".
>
> Thanks,
> -t

Thanks for your thoughts.