[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Infrastructural complexity.
From: |
martin rudalics |
Subject: |
Re: Infrastructural complexity. |
Date: |
Wed, 29 Jul 2009 11:06:00 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) |
>> It wouldn't be too difficult to make Emacs windows only exist within
>> "attached frames" aka as frames.
>
> I agree that that would not be difficult.
> I think, however, that that would be a mistake
> in the design. In every window system window
> there should be a set of Emacs windows for which
> the selected frame corresponds to the window
> system window. If one of those Emacs windows
> is selected then minimizing the corresponding
> frame (etc.) should have its effect on the window
> system window (and by extension on any "attached
> frames").
The `window-frame' of any window would be an attached frame that has an
associated primary window aka window-system window. Why would that be a
mistake in the design?
> The "edit area" frame should, at least from
> the perspective of elisp and interactive
> commands, be "the frame which corresponds to
> the window system window".
If the edit-area frame is an attached frame it doesn't correspond to a
window-system window. If it's a primary frame the size of its windows
don't sum up to its size. What am I missing?
martin
- Re: Infrastructural complexity., (continued)
- Re: Infrastructural complexity., martin rudalics, 2009/07/27
- RE: Infrastructural complexity., Drew Adams, 2009/07/27
- Re: Infrastructural complexity., martin rudalics, 2009/07/27
- RE: Infrastructural complexity., Drew Adams, 2009/07/27
- Re: Infrastructural complexity., martin rudalics, 2009/07/28
- RE: Infrastructural complexity., Drew Adams, 2009/07/28
- Re: Infrastructural complexity., martin rudalics, 2009/07/29
- Re: Infrastructural complexity., Thomas Lord, 2009/07/27
- Re: Infrastructural complexity., martin rudalics, 2009/07/28
- Re: Infrastructural complexity., Thomas Lord, 2009/07/28
- Re: Infrastructural complexity.,
martin rudalics <=
- Re: Infrastructural complexity., Thomas Lord, 2009/07/29
- Re: Infrastructural complexity., martin rudalics, 2009/07/30
- Re: Infrastructural complexity., Thomas Lord, 2009/07/30
- Re: Infrastructural complexity., martin rudalics, 2009/07/31
- Re: Infrastructural complexity., Thomas Lord, 2009/07/31
- Re: Infrastructural complexity., martin rudalics, 2009/07/31
- Re: Infrastructural complexity., Thomas Lord, 2009/07/31
- Re: Infrastructural complexity., Thomas Lord, 2009/07/22
- Re: Infrastructural complexity., martin rudalics, 2009/07/23
- Re: Infrastructural complexity., martin rudalics, 2009/07/18