[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: merge conlict?
From: |
Andreas Schwab |
Subject: |
Re: merge conlict? |
Date: |
Mon, 25 Jan 2010 14:00:52 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.91 (gnu/linux) |
Óscar Fuentes <address@hidden> writes:
> While bisecting the DAG, either you remain on the left-most part, and
> then those revisions are ignored, or traverse the merged history too,
> and then you take into account lots of revisions which were intermediate
> local points on the development of some feature.
Bisection must always take all parents into account. Otherwise how can
it find out the exact revision?
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, address@hidden
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
- Re: merge conlict?, (continued)
- Re: merge conlict?, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/01/25
- Re: merge conlict?, Andreas Schwab, 2010/01/25
- Re: merge conlict?, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/01/25
- Re: merge conlict?, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/01/25
- Re: merge conlict?, Teemu Likonen, 2010/01/25
- Re: merge conlict?, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/01/25
- Re: merge conlict?, Andreas Schwab, 2010/01/25
- Re: merge conlict?, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/01/25
- Re: merge conlict?,
Andreas Schwab <=
- Re: merge conlict?, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/01/25
- Re: merge conlict?, Andreas Schwab, 2010/01/25
- Re: merge conlict?, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/01/25
- Re: merge conlict?, Andreas Schwab, 2010/01/25
- Re: merge conlict?, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/01/25
- Re: merge conlict?, Andreas Schwab, 2010/01/25
- Re: merge conlict?, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/01/25
- Re: merge conlict?, Andreas Schwab, 2010/01/25
- Re: merge conlict?, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/01/25
- Re: merge conlict?, Andreas Schwab, 2010/01/25