[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: next emacs version?
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
RE: next emacs version? |
Date: |
Fri, 19 Mar 2010 23:51:33 -0700 |
> > But sometimes (esp. if the release cycle is long) I do make
> > changes (esp. if minor) that allow my code to keep working with the latest
> > development version. That's sometimes easy when it concerns a
> > new var or fn (but not arity change etc. for a fn).
>
> advice.el has code for figuring out the arg list of a
> function, so you can check arity changes. Though, the
> easiest way may turn out to be loading advice and calling
> ad-arglist....
No, I'm not going to go there. If I really have to deal with that, then I'm more
likely to use `condition-case' and try first the newer signature, backing out to
the older signature in case of error. (Obviously, that only works for some kinds
of changes.)
- Re: next emacs version?, (continued)
- Re: next emacs version?, Ken Raeburn, 2010/03/20
- Re: next emacs version?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/03/22
- RE: next emacs version?, Drew Adams, 2010/03/19
- Re: next emacs version?, Ken Raeburn, 2010/03/20
- RE: next emacs version?, Drew Adams, 2010/03/20
- Re: next emacs version?, Ken Raeburn, 2010/03/20
- RE: next emacs version?,
Drew Adams <=
- RE: next emacs version?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/03/22
- Re: next emacs version?, Miles Bader, 2010/03/23
- RE: next emacs version?, Drew Adams, 2010/03/23
- Re: next emacs version?, Jason Rumney, 2010/03/19
- RE: next emacs version?, Drew Adams, 2010/03/20
- Re: next emacs version?, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/03/20
- RE: next emacs version?, Drew Adams, 2010/03/20
- Re: next emacs version?, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/03/20
- Re: next emacs version?, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/03/20
- Re: next emacs version?, Stefan Monnier, 2010/03/19