[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: next emacs version?
From: |
Lennart Borgman |
Subject: |
Re: next emacs version? |
Date: |
Sat, 20 Mar 2010 03:39:13 +0100 |
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 3:35 AM, Ken Raeburn <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> Unless you want to start putting bzr revision numbers into the emacs version
> string (which I think is a bad idea), that's going to be the case.
But perhaps having the bzr version available in another variable in
the build Emacs would be a good idea?
- next emacs version?, Drew Adams, 2010/03/19
- Re: next emacs version?, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/03/19
- RE: next emacs version?, Drew Adams, 2010/03/19
- Re: next emacs version?, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/03/19
- RE: next emacs version?, Drew Adams, 2010/03/19
- Re: next emacs version?, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/03/19
- RE: next emacs version?, Drew Adams, 2010/03/19
- Re: next emacs version?, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/03/19
- RE: next emacs version?, Drew Adams, 2010/03/19
- Re: next emacs version?, Ken Raeburn, 2010/03/19
- Re: next emacs version?,
Lennart Borgman <=
- Re: next emacs version?, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/03/19
- Re: next emacs version?, Lennart Borgman, 2010/03/20
- Re: next emacs version?, Ken Raeburn, 2010/03/20
- Re: next emacs version?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/03/22
- RE: next emacs version?, Drew Adams, 2010/03/19
- Re: next emacs version?, Ken Raeburn, 2010/03/20
- RE: next emacs version?, Drew Adams, 2010/03/20
- Re: next emacs version?, Ken Raeburn, 2010/03/20
- RE: next emacs version?, Drew Adams, 2010/03/20
- RE: next emacs version?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/03/22