[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Hl-line and visual-line
From: |
Lennart Borgman |
Subject: |
Re: Hl-line and visual-line |
Date: |
Sat, 22 May 2010 04:35:25 +0200 |
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 2:18 AM, Stefan Monnier
<address@hidden> wrote:
>> Didn't I send something for that long ago? I am not sure anymore.
>
> No idea.
>
>> I am not even sure I understand the code. Is it just a simple change
>> in face_at_buffer_position in xfaces.c that is needed?
>
> No. This is a change to overlays and hence affects all properties, not
> just `face'. Maybe it'll also require changes in xfaces.c as well, but the
> core change should be somewhat around the code that implements
> functionality like get-char-property.
Thanks, forgot. I looked up all places calling sort_overlays and
changed the relevant ones (I skipped mouse overlays).
However my current patch does not work as I expect in one regard: When
I use hi-lock with text properties marking and an overlay with
negative priority behind the text the hi-lock faces seems to disappear
when I mark again with hi-lock. I can't figure out what might be
wrong. Any ideas?
- Re: Hl-line and visual-line, (continued)
- Re: Hl-line and visual-line, Lennart Borgman, 2010/05/24
- Re: Hl-line and visual-line, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/05/24
- Re: Hl-line and visual-line, Lennart Borgman, 2010/05/24
- Re: Hl-line and visual-line, David Reitter, 2010/05/24
- Re: Hl-line and visual-line, Lennart Borgman, 2010/05/24
- Re: Hl-line and visual-line, Lennart Borgman, 2010/05/21
- Re: Hl-line and visual-line, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/05/21
- Re: Hl-line and visual-line, Stefan Monnier, 2010/05/21
- Re: Hl-line and visual-line, Lennart Borgman, 2010/05/21
- Re: Hl-line and visual-line, Stefan Monnier, 2010/05/21
- Re: Hl-line and visual-line,
Lennart Borgman <=
- Re: Hl-line and visual-line, Lennart Borgman, 2010/05/22
- Re: Hl-line and visual-line, Lennart Borgman, 2010/05/22
- Re: Hl-line and visual-line, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/05/21