[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: A better autogen.sh
From: |
Glenn Morris |
Subject: |
Re: A better autogen.sh |
Date: |
Thu, 17 Mar 2011 16:36:08 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) |
Paul Eggert wrote:
>> Yes, I like `autogen', thank you.
>
> In gnulib-using projects such as coreutils, the standard name for this
> directory is 'build-aux'.
I'm not massively fond of "build-aux" as a name, but I don't really care.
Should the things you propose to move there be in release tarfiles?
Because the things I would move to "autogen/" should not (because
releases get "proper" configure etc pre-built), so that might be a
reason to have two separate directories; although of course make-dist
could handle it if both kinds of thing were in the same directory.
- Re: A better autogen.sh, (continued)
- Re: A better autogen.sh, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/03/16
- Re: A better autogen.sh, Stefan Monnier, 2011/03/16
- Re: A better autogen.sh, Glenn Morris, 2011/03/16
- Re: A better autogen.sh, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/03/16
- Re: A better autogen.sh, Stefan Monnier, 2011/03/16
- Re: A better autogen.sh, Paul Eggert, 2011/03/16
- Re: A better autogen.sh,
Glenn Morris <=
- Re: A better autogen.sh, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/03/17
- Re: A better autogen.sh, Glenn Morris, 2011/03/17
- Re: A better autogen.sh, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/03/17
- Re: A better autogen.sh, Paul Eggert, 2011/03/17
- Re: A better autogen.sh, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/03/16
- Re: A better autogen.sh, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/03/16
Re: A better autogen.sh [was Re: Still unable to build trunk], chad, 2011/03/28