[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: A better autogen.sh
From: |
Paul Eggert |
Subject: |
Re: A better autogen.sh |
Date: |
Thu, 17 Mar 2011 19:02:37 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.14) Gecko/20110223 Thunderbird/3.1.8 |
On 03/17/2011 01:36 PM, Glenn Morris wrote:
> Should the things you propose to move there be in release tarfiles?
Yes, they're used during builds.
> Because the things I would move to "autogen/" should not (because
> releases get "proper" configure etc pre-built), so that might be a
> reason to have two separate directories; although of course make-dist
> could handle it if both kinds of thing were in the same directory.
Sorry, I guess I misunderstood what went into autogen/. In that
case perhaps the two directories should be kept distinct.
- Re: A better autogen.sh, (continued)
- Re: A better autogen.sh, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/03/16
- Re: A better autogen.sh, Stefan Monnier, 2011/03/16
- Re: A better autogen.sh, Glenn Morris, 2011/03/16
- Re: A better autogen.sh, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/03/16
- Re: A better autogen.sh, Stefan Monnier, 2011/03/16
- Re: A better autogen.sh, Paul Eggert, 2011/03/16
- Re: A better autogen.sh, Glenn Morris, 2011/03/17
- Re: A better autogen.sh, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/03/17
- Re: A better autogen.sh, Glenn Morris, 2011/03/17
- Re: A better autogen.sh, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/03/17
- Re: A better autogen.sh,
Paul Eggert <=
- Re: A better autogen.sh, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/03/16
- Re: A better autogen.sh, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/03/16
Re: A better autogen.sh [was Re: Still unable to build trunk], chad, 2011/03/28
- Re: A better autogen.sh, Glenn Morris, 2011/03/28
- Re: A better autogen.sh, Stefan Monnier, 2011/03/28
- Re: A better autogen.sh, Glenn Morris, 2011/03/28
- Re: A better autogen.sh, Stefan Monnier, 2011/03/28
- Re: A better autogen.sh, Glenn Morris, 2011/03/29