Re: Binding M-n and M-p to forward-paragraph and backward-paragraphrespectively

[Leo]

On 2011-04-10 03:26 +0800, Drew Adams wrote:
> No, that was true also in the other case, as it is in most cases where a 
> binding
> is explicitly only for _default_ behavior.
>
> That's the point: Some people _mis_understand, thinking that the existence of 
> a
> default binding means that the binding is in some way reserved.  And as I
> mentioned, the more a default key gets used commonly, the more people shy away
> from rebinding it.  Creating a default binding is not without behavioral
> consequences.

M-n/p always mean something for history navigation for me. I prefer
Emacs leave those (global) keys alone too.

Leo