[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: md5 broken?

From: Paul Eggert
Subject: Re: md5 broken?
Date: Sun, 29 May 2011 22:31:25 -0700
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv: Gecko/20110424 Thunderbird/3.1.10

On 05/29/11 19:47, Ken Raeburn wrote:
> My understanding is that the traditional GCC and C99 interpretations
> for "inline" and "extern inline" are basically reversed.

Although the two interpretations of "inline" are different, Emacs
sticks to the intersection of the two, so it should be OK.

One part of this intersection is "static inline".  Another part
is when a function is first declared without "inline" and then
defined with "inline".  Emacs always done one or the other;
otherwise its current use of "INLINE" wouldn't be safe.

Here's where this is documented:


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]