[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: md5 broken?

From: Ken Raeburn
Subject: Re: md5 broken?
Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 00:22:16 -0400

On May 30, 2011, at 01:31, Paul Eggert wrote:
>   Another part
> is when a function is first declared without "inline" and then
> defined with "inline".  Emacs always done one or the other;
> otherwise its current use of "INLINE" wouldn't be safe.
> Here's where this is documented:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.6.0/gcc/Inline.html

Ah, interesting.  I hadn't known about the second case.  I'll have to look at 
that a little more closely.  Thanks!


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]