[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Idea for C-x v u
From: |
Andreas Röhler |
Subject: |
Re: Idea for C-x v u |
Date: |
Tue, 28 Jun 2011 16:51:55 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; de; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 SUSE/3.1.10 Thunderbird/3.1.10 |
Am 27.06.2011 15:06, schrieb Richard Stallman:
It is definitely a good idea to check the diffs of a file before
reverting a change, but normally it's a waste of time for C-x v u to
do that because I will have done it manually.
However, if I ever forget to do that, it wouldn't hurt for C-x v u to
remind me.
Hi,
think it might pay more to consider the conditions when forgetting occurs.
If it's just to late, a warning might make you still more forgetting.
BTW a feature I most enjoy is abolish warnings when a buffer get's closed.
(defun kill-buffer-unconditional (&optional puffer)
" "
(interactive)
(when puffer
(set-buffer puffer)
(switch-to-buffer (current-buffer))
)
(set-buffer-modified-p 'nil)
(kill-buffer (current-buffer)))
Well, sorry, that's again the opposite direction :)
Seriously: usually run two different VC's at same time: RCS in the
background, committing more often --and without messages-- while above
bazaar or whatever gets it, when it seems done.
Cheers,
Andreas
- Re: Idea for C-x v u, (continued)
- Re: Idea for C-x v u, Jan D., 2011/06/28
- Re: Idea for C-x v u, Óscar Fuentes, 2011/06/28
- Re: Idea for C-x v u, Jan D., 2011/06/29
- Re: Idea for C-x v u, David Kastrup, 2011/06/29
- Re: Idea for C-x v u, Andreas Röhler, 2011/06/29
- Re: Idea for C-x v u, Jan D., 2011/06/29
- Re: Idea for C-x v u, Stefan Monnier, 2011/06/30
- RE: Idea for C-x v u, Drew Adams, 2011/06/30
Re: Idea for C-x v u,
Andreas Röhler <=