[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: display-buffer-alist simplifications

From: martin rudalics
Subject: Re: display-buffer-alist simplifications
Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2011 02:25:49 +0200
User-agent: Thunderbird (Windows/20090302)

> One question: is there any reason you gave the revised `pop-to-buffer-*'
> functions arglists of (&optional buffer-or-name norecord)?  These
> functions didn't exist in Emacs 23, so it seems that they should be
> written to be pluggable into (the revised) display-buffer-alist.  So the
> second argument should instead be an action list instead of NORECORD,
> right?

I don't know.  If we do so, then the action list should be probably also
made an argument of the switch-to-* family of functions which, IIUC,
according to Stefan should remain callable from programs.

I wouldn't have included the pop-to-* functions in the first place but
there are already too many callers around.  So please rewrite them the
way you consider most suitable.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]