[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: smtp crap
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: smtp crap |
Date: |
Tue, 11 Oct 2011 09:34:20 +0900 |
Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:
>> Even if it works flawlessly, this "feature" should _not_ be the default.
>
> As long as we don't have a better solution, yes it should be
> the default. And for Emacs-24 we won't have a better solution so it
> will be the default.
So, this presumes that "smtp-using-user-prompted-info" is on average
more reliable than "use sendmail," even in the case where sendmail can
be invoked.
Is there data to back up this presumption?
If they're of roughly equal reliablity, of course, the least annoying
option should be chosen -- and that's "sendmail."
-Miles
--
Americans are broad-minded people. They'll accept the fact that a person can
be an alcoholic, a dope fiend, a wife beater, and even a newspaperman, but if
a man doesn't drive, there is something wrong with him. -- Art Buchwald
- Re: smtp crap, (continued)
- Re: smtp crap, David Engster, 2011/10/08
- Re: smtp crap, Bastien, 2011/10/08
- Re: smtp crap, Miles Bader, 2011/10/08
- Re: smtp crap, Harry Putnam, 2011/10/08
- Re: smtp crap, Stefan Monnier, 2011/10/10
- RE: smtp crap, Drew Adams, 2011/10/10
- Re: smtp crap, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2011/10/10
- Re: smtp crap, Glenn Morris, 2011/10/10
- RE: smtp crap, Drew Adams, 2011/10/11
- Re: smtp crap, Stefan Monnier, 2011/10/10
- Re: smtp crap,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: smtp crap, Stefan Monnier, 2011/10/10
- Re: smtp crap, Miles Bader, 2011/10/11
- Re: smtp crap, chad, 2011/10/11
- Re: smtp crap, Tim Cross, 2011/10/11
- Re: smtp crap, Stefan Monnier, 2011/10/11
- RE: smtp crap, Drew Adams, 2011/10/11
- RE: smtp crap, Drew Adams, 2011/10/11
- RE: smtp crap, Drew Adams, 2011/10/11
- RE: smtp crap, Drew Adams, 2011/10/26
- Re: smtp crap, Adam Sjøgren, 2011/10/26