[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Extra info about 109170
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Extra info about 109170 |
Date: |
Mon, 23 Jul 2012 18:31:07 +0300 |
> From: Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>
> Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2012 04:55:14 -0400
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden
>
> >> > I'd appreciate if someone could explain why are we excited about 8%
> >> > speedup, and on top of that in massive byte-compiling (something that
> >> > can hardly be described as a frequent operation).
> >> 8% speedup in an actual run of Emacs is a pretty good speed up for such
> >> a small change.
> > Any speedup is good. I just don't see how speeding up kill-buffer is
> > something people should be using up their time for.
>
> The purpose was not to speed up kill-buffer but byte-compilation, AFAICT.
I was talking about the result, not the purpose.
- Extra info about 109170, Dmitry Antipov, 2012/07/20
- Re: Extra info about 109170, Stefan Monnier, 2012/07/21
- Re: Extra info about 109170, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/07/21
- Re: Extra info about 109170, Stefan Monnier, 2012/07/22
- Re: Extra info about 109170, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/07/22
- Re: Extra info about 109170, Stefan Monnier, 2012/07/23
- Re: Extra info about 109170, joakim, 2012/07/23
- Re: Extra info about 109170, Nix, 2012/07/23
- Re: Extra info about 109170,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Extra info about 109170, Stefan Monnier, 2012/07/23
- Re: Extra info about 109170, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/07/24
- Re: Extra info about 109170, Stefan Monnier, 2012/07/24
- Re: Extra info about 109170, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/07/24
- Re: Extra info about 109170, Stefan Monnier, 2012/07/25