[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Extra info about 109170
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Extra info about 109170 |
Date: |
Tue, 24 Jul 2012 20:00:34 +0300 |
> From: Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden
> Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2012 19:06:53 -0400
>
> The problem was that kill-buffer was taking up more than 10% of the time
> of execution, which is simply unjustified. I only know of 2 ways to fix
> such a problem:
> - speed up kill-buffer.
> - call kill-buffer less often.
> (tho I guess you can also "fix" it by slowing down everything else,
> but that's not very interesting, is it?).
> So unless you mean that the right thing to do was to reduce calls to
> kill-buffer, I don't know what else you might have wanted.
I think, if we want to speed up byte compilation, the right thing is
to speed the compilation itself, not buffer-killing whose relevance to
byte compilation is, well, questionable.
- Extra info about 109170, Dmitry Antipov, 2012/07/20
- Re: Extra info about 109170, Stefan Monnier, 2012/07/21
- Re: Extra info about 109170, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/07/21
- Re: Extra info about 109170, Stefan Monnier, 2012/07/22
- Re: Extra info about 109170, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/07/22
- Re: Extra info about 109170, Stefan Monnier, 2012/07/23
- Re: Extra info about 109170, joakim, 2012/07/23
- Re: Extra info about 109170, Nix, 2012/07/23
- Re: Extra info about 109170, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/07/23
- Re: Extra info about 109170, Stefan Monnier, 2012/07/23
- Re: Extra info about 109170,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Extra info about 109170, Stefan Monnier, 2012/07/24
- Re: Extra info about 109170, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/07/24
- Re: Extra info about 109170, Stefan Monnier, 2012/07/25