|
From: | Jason Rumney |
Subject: | Re: [Emacs-diffs] /srv/bzr/emacs/trunk r109864: Fix minor problems found by static checking. |
Date: | Tue, 04 Sep 2012 22:29:59 +0800 |
User-agent: | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
Paul Eggert <address@hidden> writes: > Emacs tends to avoid 'const', though, partly > because it predates 'const, and partly I expect because > even in these other cases the readability advantage of > omitting 'const' arguably trumps the minor advantages > of using 'const'. I think mostly because retrofitting const to a codebase the size of Emacs is a huge task, and isn't something that can be done gradually.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |