Re: Emacs seems awfully unstable on OS X lately

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <address@hidden>
> Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2012 18:37:38 +0900
> Cc: Harald Hanche-Olsen <address@hidden>, address@hidden
> 
> bzr branch --revision=109469 trunk no-109470
> cd no-109470
> bzr merge --revision 109471..last:0 ../trunk
> 
> should do the trick.

Why is the second command necessary?  Are you assuming that the bug
was introduced after 109470?

My line of thought was: it's quite easy to establish whether the bug
is present in 109471, with 109470 reverse cherry-picked.  If it is
present, bisect the trunk where 109470 is removed; if it is not
present, bisect the branch created by the first command above.

Wouldn't that work, too?