[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Emacs seems awfully unstable on OS X lately

From: Eli Zaretskii
Subject: Re: Emacs seems awfully unstable on OS X lately
Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2012 17:21:53 +0300

> From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden,
>     address@hidden,
>     address@hidden
> Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2012 22:46:22 +0900
> Eli Zaretskii writes:
>  > Why is the second command necessary?  Are you assuming that the bug
>  > was introduced after 109470?
> No.  I'm simply allowing for the possibility that it was.
> > 
>  > My line of thought was: it's quite easy to establish whether the bug
>  > is present in 109471, with 109470 reverse cherry-picked.  If it is
>  > present, bisect the trunk where 109470 is removed;
> How do you propose doing that?  It's not possible to remove a revision
> from a branch.

By a local commit after reverse cherry-picking, I guess.  Or will this
not work when bisect selects some revision before the commit?

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]