Re: Emacs seems awfully unstable on OS X lately

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden,
>     address@hidden,
>     address@hidden
> Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2012 22:46:22 +0900
> 
> Eli Zaretskii writes:
> 
>  > Why is the second command necessary?  Are you assuming that the bug
>  > was introduced after 109470?
> 
> No.  I'm simply allowing for the possibility that it was.
> > 
>  > My line of thought was: it's quite easy to establish whether the bug
>  > is present in 109471, with 109470 reverse cherry-picked.  If it is
>  > present, bisect the trunk where 109470 is removed;
> 
> How do you propose doing that?  It's not possible to remove a revision
> from a branch.

By a local commit after reverse cherry-picking, I guess.  Or will this
not work when bisect selects some revision before the commit?