[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: EOL: unix/dos/mac
From: |
Stephen J. Turnbull |
Subject: |
Re: EOL: unix/dos/mac |
Date: |
Wed, 27 Mar 2013 14:10:55 +0900 |
Eli Zaretskii writes:
> You don't need a proof, because I agree. But we already have quite a
> few features that introduce peculiar effects into character motion,
> and they didn't cause any catastrophes. I don't see why this one is
> any different.
If your standard is "catastrophes", then (a) no, this one is no
different, and (b) I have no contribution to make, because the
contribution I want to make requires concern with problems that are
less than catastrophic.
- Re: EOL: unix/dos/mac, (continued)
- Re: EOL: unix/dos/mac, Stefan Monnier, 2013/03/25
- Re: EOL: unix/dos/mac, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2013/03/25
- Re: EOL: unix/dos/mac, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/03/26
- Re: EOL: unix/dos/mac, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2013/03/26
- Re: EOL: unix/dos/mac, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/03/26
- Re: EOL: unix/dos/mac, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2013/03/26
- Re: EOL: unix/dos/mac, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/03/26
- Re: EOL: unix/dos/mac, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2013/03/26
- Re: EOL: unix/dos/mac, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/03/26
- Re: EOL: unix/dos/mac,
Stephen J. Turnbull <=
- Re: EOL: unix/dos/mac, Stefan Monnier, 2013/03/26
- Re: EOL: unix/dos/mac, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/03/26
- Re: EOL: unix/dos/mac, Stefan Monnier, 2013/03/26
- Re: EOL: unix/dos/mac, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/03/26
- Re: EOL: unix/dos/mac, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2013/03/26
- Re: EOL: unix/dos/mac, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2013/03/26
- Re: EOL: unix/dos/mac, Alan Mackenzie, 2013/03/26
- Re: EOL: unix/dos/mac, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/03/26
- Re: EOL: unix/dos/mac, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2013/03/26
Re: EOL: unix/dos/mac, Ulrich Mueller, 2013/03/26