[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development |
Date: |
Thu, 28 Mar 2013 14:58:52 -0400 |
My point is not that you should spend time on it, but that it is
painfully evident for those of us that do follow the Bazaar
developers' list.
_Some_ conclusion is painfully evident to you, but it is not clear
what your conclusion implies for the decision I face. We are, in
essence, miscommunicating.
Even if the maintainers fix these bugs by your request, that means
nothing IMHO.
I hope you understand that before I take the drastic step of giving up
on a package, I need to be convinced there is no hope. People on this
list are proposing that I give up after a snap judgment based on a
weaker criterion. I won't do that. The advice which suggests I do that
is not useful or relevant.
The help that I need, to make the decision, is to give me the
corrdinates of the specific Bzr bug report about the ELPA branch.
There should be someone on this list for whom that would be quick and
easy.
Without this help, my decision will be stuck in the same limbo where
it has been stuck for some months. Please help me out.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation
51 Franklin St
Boston MA 02110
USA
www.fsf.org www.gnu.org
Skype: No way! That's nonfree (freedom-denying) software.
Use Ekiga or an ordinary phone call
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, (continued)
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Leo Liu, 2013/03/28
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, joakim, 2013/03/28
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2013/03/28
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Richard Stallman, 2013/03/28
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Karl Fogel, 2013/03/28
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Richard Stallman, 2013/03/28
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Juanma Barranquero, 2013/03/28
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Richard Stallman, 2013/03/28
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Juanma Barranquero, 2013/03/28
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Stefan Monnier, 2013/03/28
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, John Wiegley, 2013/03/28
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/03/28
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Richard Stallman, 2013/03/28
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/03/28
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Allen S. Rout, 2013/03/27
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Josh, 2013/03/27
Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Stefan Monnier, 2013/03/27
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Richard Stallman, 2013/03/28
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, Stefan Monnier, 2013/03/28
- Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development, John Wiegley, 2013/03/28