[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: clang vs free software

From: Rüdiger Sonderfeld
Subject: Re: clang vs free software
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 19:44:15 +0100
User-agent: KMail/4.11.3 (Linux/3.11.0-14-generic; KDE/4.11.3; x86_64; ; )

On Tuesday 21 January 2014 19:00:26 Thien-Thi Nguyen wrote:
> () Rüdiger Sonderfeld <address@hidden>
> () Tue, 21 Jan 2014 17:34:10 +0100
>    For gcc-etags to a file in etag format
>    and for the other experiment a sexp.
> Why not write a server to which this plugin can send the hard-won
> information?  The server's job is to persist all those (incoming)
> goodies in a database somewhere (say, $projroot/.static-bits.db).
> Other clients can request the subset that is interesting to them,
> e.g., for etags (re)format(ting).
> This architecture is HURD-friendly, too (IIUC the HURD mindset).
> GNU Serveez + Guile-PG + SMOP ... 149 lines of Scheme, max.  :-D

I think at the moment it writes a file for each code file to a subdirectory in 
the $projroot.  This could of course be changed.  But right now the project is 
in a very early stage and I didn't have the time to work on it in over a year.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]