[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Basic questions about the triage process

From: Phillip Lord
Subject: Re: Basic questions about the triage process
Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2016 22:40:42 +0000
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux)

Andy Moreton <address@hidden> writes:

> On Thu 07 Jan 2016, Phillip Lord wrote:
>> Andrew Hyatt <address@hidden> writes:
>>> John Wiegley <address@hidden> writes:
>>>>>>>>> Andrew Hyatt <address@hidden> writes:
>>>> Perhaps we do need a targeted document for on-boarding bug herders. If, 
>>>> while
>>>> you're learning this process, you could keep some notes on what helped you 
>>>> to
>>>> get started, Andrew, that could become the start of such a document.
>>> I've put together my notes into a file I stuck in the admin section.
>>> I'm attaching it as a patch.  Feedback would be welcome, of course.  I'm
>>> guessing there's a few other things we'd like to put into this document
>>> as well, but I won't attempt to go beyond just the basic triage
>>> procedure we've discussed in this thread.
>> Would you object to changing the name of this file to "bug-triage". It
>> should say "bug" somewhere!
> Why ? Not all problems raised in an issue tracker are actually bugs
> (user error, misconfiguration, distro packaging issues etc).

"issue-triage" would also be fine. But "bug" is generally accepted here.
"debbugs", "bugtracker" and so on.

Just trying to increase discoverability.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]