Paul Eggert <address@hidden
> schrieb am Fr., 2. Juni 2017 um 01:20 Uhr:
On 06/01/2017 01:17 AM, Philipp Stephani wrote:
> - Probably there's a bug lurking because the info[n] ought to be
> indexed by specification index, not argument index. Something like
> (format "%1$c %1$d" ?a) will probably do the wrong thing (untested).
Sorry, I'm not following. That call returns "a 97"; isn't that the
Wrong example, try (format "%1$c %1$s" ?±)
And on further thought, the tradition for Emacs is to
document supported behavior and not worry about slowing Emacs down to
check for undocumented usage
Would be great to break that tradition, but that's for another discussion.