[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: i18n/l10n summary

From: Philipp Stephani
Subject: Re: i18n/l10n summary
Date: Sat, 03 Jun 2017 09:34:07 +0000

Paul Eggert <address@hidden> schrieb am Sa., 3. Juni 2017 um 10:37 Uhr:
Philipp Stephani wrote:
> Wrong example, try (format "%1$c %1$s" ?±)

Ouch. Fixing that (without adversely affecting performance) would be a bit of a
hassle. Not sure that it's worth it. For now let's just document the limitation.
I installed the attached.

It's not hard to fix, just the info array needs to be indexed by spec index, no argument. Installed 7d413cb4da89e0bdd70068e6a5e1dbc57190ed10; 0147cdd4d96f1eaeef720ee0b89bddd27eaf4233 can now be reverted. 

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]