[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: In support of Jonas Bernoulli's Magit
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: In support of Jonas Bernoulli's Magit |
Date: |
Mon, 10 Jul 2017 19:27:26 -0400 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> > We don't have to wait till there are only 4 nonsigning contributors to
> > start steps 9 and 10. It would be feasible to do with 10 or 20 or 50
> > contributors left out, if their code is small. Thus, I suggest
> > identifying after a few months those whose code is not too hard to
> > replace.
> Actually, I do this at the beginning. Not all contributors actually have
> code in the current version, so it's good to know this from the
> start. For dash, I just asked everybody, though, on the basis that if
> they had code in before, they might do in the future.
That's a wise approach. It can't hurt to invite the
not-actual-contributors to sign -- but there is no need to wait until
they do.
However, I was talking about a point that is slightly broader.
The point is that we can cope with more than 4 nonsigners,
if their contributions are not crucial.
That is important if there are more people we cannot contact.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation (gnu.org, fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (internethalloffame.org)
Skype: No way! See stallman.org/skype.html.
- Re: In support of Jonas Bernoulli's Magit, (continued)
- Re: In support of Jonas Bernoulli's Magit, Richard Stallman, 2017/07/08
- Re: In support of Jonas Bernoulli's Magit, Richard Stallman, 2017/07/10
- Re: In support of Jonas Bernoulli's Magit, Phillip Lord, 2017/07/10
- Re: In support of Jonas Bernoulli's Magit, Richard Stallman, 2017/07/10
- Re: In support of Jonas Bernoulli's Magit, Phillip Lord, 2017/07/11
- Re: In support of Jonas Bernoulli's Magit, Richard Stallman, 2017/07/11
- Re: In support of Jonas Bernoulli's Magit,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: In support of Jonas Bernoulli's Magit, Marcin Borkowski, 2017/07/10
- Re: In support of Jonas Bernoulli's Magit, Richard Stallman, 2017/07/10
- Re: In support of Jonas Bernoulli's Magit, Marcin Borkowski, 2017/07/11
- Re: In support of Jonas Bernoulli's Magit, Richard Stallman, 2017/07/11
- Re: In support of Jonas Bernoulli's Magit, Dmitry Gutov, 2017/07/06
- Re: In support of Jonas Bernoulli's Magit, Richard Stallman, 2017/07/07
- Re: In support of Jonas Bernoulli's Magit, Stefan Monnier, 2017/07/07
- Re: In support of Jonas Bernoulli's Magit, Richard Stallman, 2017/07/08
- Re: In support of Jonas Bernoulli's Magit, raman, 2017/07/08
- Re: In support of Jonas Bernoulli's Magit, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/07/08