[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: In support of Jonas Bernoulli's Magit
From: |
Marcin Borkowski |
Subject: |
Re: In support of Jonas Bernoulli's Magit |
Date: |
Tue, 11 Jul 2017 06:20:53 +0200 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 0.9.19; emacs 26.0.50 |
On 2017-07-11, at 01:30, Richard Stallman <address@hidden> wrote:
> [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
> [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
> [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
>
> > > Step 8 is easy if you make a list of all the contributors, one per
> > > line, and add a * once a contributors's papers are done. I think that
> > > will be faster and easier than using RT to keep track of them.
>
> > This looks to me like reinventing Org-mode.
>
> Nothing like Org mode. Org mode is complicated and I want something
> simple. My method uses only a few general-purpose Emacs commands:
> C-p, C-n, C-s, C-a, * and SPC.
What gives you the impression that Org-mode is complicated?
The Org method would use only _one_ basic Org command: apart from C-n,
C-p and C-s, you'd only need C-c C-t (unless you are fine with typing
TODO/DONE manually). Of course, you'd also be free to use C-c C-n/C-c
C-p, C-c C-f/C-c C-b and above all C-c C-/, which could be tremendously
helpful.
Best,
--
Marcin Borkowski
- Re: In support of Jonas Bernoulli's Magit, (continued)
- Re: In support of Jonas Bernoulli's Magit, Richard Stallman, 2017/07/10
- Re: In support of Jonas Bernoulli's Magit, Richard Stallman, 2017/07/08
- Re: In support of Jonas Bernoulli's Magit, Richard Stallman, 2017/07/10
- Re: In support of Jonas Bernoulli's Magit, Phillip Lord, 2017/07/10
- Re: In support of Jonas Bernoulli's Magit, Richard Stallman, 2017/07/10
- Re: In support of Jonas Bernoulli's Magit, Phillip Lord, 2017/07/11
- Re: In support of Jonas Bernoulli's Magit, Richard Stallman, 2017/07/11
- Re: In support of Jonas Bernoulli's Magit, Richard Stallman, 2017/07/10
- Re: In support of Jonas Bernoulli's Magit, Marcin Borkowski, 2017/07/10
- Re: In support of Jonas Bernoulli's Magit, Richard Stallman, 2017/07/10
- Re: In support of Jonas Bernoulli's Magit,
Marcin Borkowski <=
- Re: In support of Jonas Bernoulli's Magit, Richard Stallman, 2017/07/11
- Re: In support of Jonas Bernoulli's Magit, Dmitry Gutov, 2017/07/06
- Re: In support of Jonas Bernoulli's Magit, Richard Stallman, 2017/07/07
- Re: In support of Jonas Bernoulli's Magit, Stefan Monnier, 2017/07/07
- Re: In support of Jonas Bernoulli's Magit, Richard Stallman, 2017/07/08
- Re: In support of Jonas Bernoulli's Magit, raman, 2017/07/08
- Re: In support of Jonas Bernoulli's Magit, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/07/08
- Re: In support of Jonas Bernoulli's Magit, Phillip Lord, 2017/07/08
- Re: In support of Jonas Bernoulli's Magit, John Yates, 2017/07/08
- Re: In support of Jonas Bernoulli's Magit, raman, 2017/07/08