[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: i18n/l10n summary
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: i18n/l10n summary |
Date: |
Sat, 22 Jul 2017 16:06:19 +0300 |
> From: Jean-Christophe Helary <address@hidden>
> Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2017 21:48:29 +0900
>
>
> > On Jul 18, 2017, at 8:22, Jean-Christophe Helary <address@hidden> wrote:
> >>>> The discussion so far seems to point at modifying 'message' and
> >>>> the likes so that developers don't have to bother with any l10n
> >>>> mechanism on their part (besides for writing clean strings).
> >>
> >> Just as a reminder, we'll need to update all the texi files so that they
> >> include:
> >> @documentlanguage
> >> @documentencoding
> >
> > Is it ok to proceed with that ?
>
> I don't think there was a reply to that so I guess that's a yes.
Actually, I didn't reply because I didn't understand what was the
question. Can you remind me?
- Re: i18n/l10n summary, Jean-Christophe Helary, 2017/07/01
- Re: i18n/l10n summary, Jean-Christophe Helary, 2017/07/17
- Re: i18n/l10n summary, Jean-Christophe Helary, 2017/07/22
- Re: i18n/l10n summary,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: i18n/l10n summary, Jean-Christophe Helary, 2017/07/22
- Re: i18n/l10n summary, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/07/22
- Re: i18n/l10n summary, Jean-Christophe Helary, 2017/07/22
- Re: i18n/l10n summary, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/07/23
- Re: i18n/l10n summary, Jean-Christophe Helary, 2017/07/23
- Re: i18n/l10n summary, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/07/24
- Re: i18n/l10n summary, Jean-Christophe Helary, 2017/07/24
- Re: i18n/l10n summary, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/07/24
- Re: i18n/l10n summary, Jean-Christophe Helary, 2017/07/24
- Re: i18n/l10n summary, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/07/24