[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: bignum branch

From: Tom Tromey
Subject: Re: bignum branch
Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2018 13:30:28 -0600
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1.50 (gnu/linux)

>>>>> "Tom" == Tom Tromey <address@hidden> writes:

Tom> I am somewhat inclined to pursue the approach I mentioned earlier: make
Tom> a new branch, run the renaming commands there, then cherry-pick the rest
Tom> of the bignum changes on top.  Then, the final branch could be merged to
Tom> master.  This would avoid a messy merge from trunk to the branch and
Tom> then back.

I see there was a push to the feature branch to fix up the *.m files for
the big renamings -- something I forgot to do.  So maybe a merge from
master and then back again is preferable after all, to try a bit harder
to avoid regressing anything.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]