[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: thread-alive-p ? Why not thread-live-p?

From: Michael Albinus
Subject: Re: thread-alive-p ? Why not thread-live-p?
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2018 12:06:02 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux)

"John Wiegley" <address@hidden> writes:

>>>>>> "TT" == Tom Tromey <address@hidden> writes:
> TT> There are a few *-alive-p functions as well. I think if I had thought of
> TT> it I would have chosen thread-live-p though.

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
(let ((completion-regexp-list '("-alive-p$"))) (all-completions "" obarray))
=> ("gnus-alive-p" "thread-alive-p" "mm-keep-viewer-alive-p")

(let ((completion-regexp-list '("-live-p$"))) (all-completions "" obarray))
=> ("process-live-p" "window-live-p" "ediff-buffer-live-p" "gnus-buffer-live-p" 
"erc-server-buffer-live-p" "frame-live-p" "buffer-live-p" "dframe-live-p" 
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

> I do prefer live-p, but I'm not bothered-p either.

If nobody objects next days, I'll change the name. It's not too late, I

Best regards, Michael.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]