[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: thread-alive-p ? Why not thread-live-p?

From: Michael Albinus
Subject: Re: thread-alive-p ? Why not thread-live-p?
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2018 15:37:14 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux)

Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:

>> > I do prefer live-p, but I'm not bothered-p either.
>> If nobody objects next days, I'll change the name. It's not too late, I
>> believe.
> It's fine with me to rename, but since we already released Emacs 26.1
> with this API, we will need to leave behind an obsolete alias.

Will do. For the emacs-26 branch, or master? I'd prefer the former, in
order not to see too much code in the wild with the obsolete name.

> Thanks.

Best regards, Michael.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]