[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs i18n
From: |
Jean-Christophe Helary |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs i18n |
Date: |
Wed, 6 Mar 2019 20:23:56 +0900 |
> On Mar 6, 2019, at 18:38, Elias Mårtenson
>
> The best way to do that (I fixed the almost 100% of the package.el code with
> that) is to not use such syntax but rather things like:
>
> Number of matches found: %d
>
> That works for English most of the time (although I would argue that it isn't
> great).
I'm not sure why that is not "great" here. But I know from what I saw in
packages.el that what is even less great it to get lost in lisp that attempts
to mimic natural language inflections.
> But it may be harder in other languages.
It is unlikely that this structure is harder in non English languages than the
original. Removing the need to express the difference in number actually
removes an order of complexity.
Jean-Christophe Helary
-----------------------------------------------
http://mac4translators.blogspot.com @brandelune
- Re: bug#34520: delete-matching-lines should report how many lines it deleted, Richard Stallman, 2019/03/02
- Re: Emacs i18n (was: bug#34520: delete-matching-lines should report how many lines it deleted), Eli Zaretskii, 2019/03/03
- Re: Emacs i18n, Juri Linkov, 2019/03/03
- Re: Emacs i18n, Clément Pit-Claudel, 2019/03/21
- Re: Emacs i18n, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/03/21
- Re: Emacs i18n, Clément Pit-Claudel, 2019/03/21
- Re: Emacs i18n, Jean-Christophe Helary, 2019/03/21
- Re: Emacs i18n, Clément Pit-Claudel, 2019/03/21
- Re: Emacs i18n, Jean-Christophe Helary, 2019/03/21
- Re: Emacs i18n, Clément Pit-Claudel, 2019/03/21
- Re: Emacs i18n, Jean-Christophe Helary, 2019/03/21
- Re: Emacs i18n, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/03/22
- Re: Emacs i18n, Clément Pit-Claudel, 2019/03/22