Re: New rx implementation with extension constructs

[Mattias Engdegård]

5 sep. 2019 kl. 12.56 skrev Aurélien Aptel <address@hidden>:
> 
> Is this fully compatible with rx?

Yes, that is the intention. If you find an incompatibility, please report it. 
The compatibility includes the old `rx-constituents'  variable for extensions, 
which is used by python-mode.

The new implementation is slightly more general where this made sense. For 
instance, several forms that require at least one argument in current rx can be 
used with zero args in the new code. (This includes the `rx' macro itself.)

Other than that, and the new extension mechanism, I've resisted the temptation 
to add features, but I have a list of things that would be useful to put in 
later on.