> So much for an unintelligible package :-)
Hey, versus 600 lines of a package that plays along with every part
of Emacs I can name, yes, it's unintelligible.
Which is not to say it isn't great.
But I can say that I had a long list of ido hacks myself (for imenu,
for completion-at-point, etc). Even SLY in some situations falls back
to ido when it doesn't find anything else. Don't knock me, I'm was
a fellow IDOer for a long long time. I hope you or someone can
bring all that neat stuff to Emacs so it can be shared with other