[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ELPA] New package: transient
From: |
Adam Porter |
Subject: |
Re: [ELPA] New package: transient |
Date: |
Wed, 29 Apr 2020 07:52:40 -0500 |
Hi Jonas, et al,
On 4/28/20, Jonas Bernoulli <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> CCing three authors who use Transient in their packages because I am
> interested in their opinions about the symbol names.
Thanks for considering me. I'm generally in favor of consistent
symbol prefixes, but sometimes that leads to awkward names, so I don't
mind some exceptions. In this case, it doesn't matter to me whether
these symbols in Transient are renamed; I could easily rename the ones
used in my package to match, so I'm happy with whatever you decide.
- Re: [ELPA] New package: transient, (continued)
- Re: [ELPA] New package: transient, Stefan Monnier, 2020/04/29
- Re: [ELPA] New package: transient, Philippe Vaucher, 2020/04/29
- Re: [ELPA] New package: transient, Yuan Fu, 2020/04/29
- Re: [ELPA] New package: transient, Yuan Fu, 2020/04/29
- Re: [ELPA] New package: transient, Richard Stallman, 2020/04/29
- Re: [ELPA] New package: transient, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/04/29
- Re: [ELPA] New package: transient, Stefan Monnier, 2020/04/29
- RE: [ELPA] New package: transient, Drew Adams, 2020/04/29
- Re: [ELPA] New package: transient, Richard Stallman, 2020/04/29
- RE: [ELPA] New package: transient, Drew Adams, 2020/04/29
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: [ELPA] New package: transient,
Adam Porter <=
Re: [ELPA] New package: transient, Richard Stallman, 2020/04/29
Re: [ELPA] New package: transient, Zhu Zihao, 2020/04/30