Re: [ELPA] New package: transient

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>
> Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2020 09:32:00 -0400
> Cc: Adam Porter <address@hidden>, Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden>,
>  Jonas Bernoulli <address@hidden>, Kyle Meyer <address@hidden>,
>  Emacs developers <address@hidden>
> 
> FWIW, I completely agree with this.
> Emacs's own "core" library should follow the "prefix" convention.
> The resulting "structuring" of the names would help discoverability
> 
> This was a major motivation for the `seq` and `map` packages, and maybe
> we should keep doing that with more things (e.g. add a `list` package
> where all the list functions get a new name using the `list` prefix, or
> add a `process` package were all the process related primitives are
> given a "process-"prefix, ...).

Sure, if we don't mind having much more symbols, why not?  But someone
would have to come up with such a classification, and that may not
always be easy.