[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Imports / inclusion of s.el into Emacs

From: João Távora
Subject: Re: Imports / inclusion of s.el into Emacs
Date: Wed, 6 May 2020 22:59:10 +0100

On Wed, May 6, 2020, 22:42 Drew Adams <address@hidden> wrote:
> it's clear that s.el and dash.el want to be (very)
> short-prefixed, by their very nature, otherwise
> they lose their charm.

What is that "very nature"?  Something specific
about them?

Wouldn't a short prefix bestow the same charm
on any library?

It's a serious question, not rhetorical or
whimsical.  Is there something special about
these libraries that calls for, or fits
particularly well, with a short prefix?

Or is it just that they're already out there
with short prefixes (and the charm they bestow)?

Yep, you're right. A short prefix would be good for any library. It's just that these two were bold enough to try it and (not yet) get away with it.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]