[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: A modern-mode?
From: |
Arthur Miller |
Subject: |
Re: A modern-mode? |
Date: |
Wed, 16 Sep 2020 16:20:59 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
João Távora <joaotavora@gmail.com> writes:
> > I'm
> > almost always wary of giants or grand reinventions of things.
> > For the "base" Emacs experience that is, in their setups people
> > can use all the ivys, dooms, helms and magits they want.
> I understand your sentiment, but then, you could say this for any
> feature, inclusive fido-mode or icomplete or even find-file.
>
> I don't think you can. It's because of their simplicity that they
> are much better integrated into Emacs's infrastructure.
Just add few more thoughts: I don't think it is bc of simplicity, but
because they incorporate functionality that wasn's present when Helm/Ivy
were written.
- Re: A modern-mode?, (continued)
- Re: A modern-mode?, Arthur Miller, 2020/09/16
- Re: A modern-mode?, João Távora, 2020/09/16
- Re: A modern-mode?, Arthur Miller, 2020/09/16
- Re: A modern-mode?, João Távora, 2020/09/16
- Re: A modern-mode?, Thibaut Verron, 2020/09/16
- Re: A modern-mode?, João Távora, 2020/09/16
- Re: A modern-mode?,
Arthur Miller <=
- Re: A modern-mode?, tomas, 2020/09/16
- RE: A modern-mode?, arthur miller, 2020/09/16
- Re: A modern-mode?, Alan Third, 2020/09/17
- RE: A modern-mode?, arthur miller, 2020/09/17
- Re: A modern-mode?, Arthur Miller, 2020/09/16
RE: A modern-mode?, Drew Adams, 2020/09/16