[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Tweaking the output of `C-h b'
From: |
Stefan Kangas |
Subject: |
Re: Tweaking the output of `C-h b' |
Date: |
Sun, 31 Oct 2021 12:22:55 -0700 |
Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> writes:
> Now, the current order is (strictly speaking) correct, because those key
> translations are real and they take precedence over the rest of the
> bindings. But the likelihood of a user wanting to inspect that stuff is
> pretty low, and it's just so... long.
I usually say `C-h b C-s' to find what I'm looking for, so the length
isn't very important to me. But, on the other hand, it would save me
some typing if what I usually want is at the top. So in my use, it
doesn't matter too much if we have 50 lines or 5000 before the bits I
want. The thing that would really help me is having closer to zero.
So I'd definitely appreciate the change you suggest.
- Re: Tweaking the output of `C-h b', (continued)
- Re: Tweaking the output of `C-h b', Kévin Le Gouguec, 2021/10/31
- Re: Tweaking the output of `C-h b', Stefan Monnier, 2021/10/31
- Re: Tweaking the output of `C-h b', Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/10/31
- Re: Tweaking the output of `C-h b', Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/10/31
- Re: Tweaking the output of `C-h b', Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/10/31
- Re: Tweaking the output of `C-h b', Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/10/31
- Re: Tweaking the output of `C-h b', Stefan Kangas, 2021/10/31
Re: Tweaking the output of `C-h b',
Stefan Kangas <=
Re: Tweaking the output of `C-h b', Gregory Heytings, 2021/10/31