Re: process-file instead of call-process in proced.el?

[Michael Albinus]

Filipp Gunbin <fgunbin@fastmail.fm> writes:

> Currently, there is a reason - signal-process is not remote-host aware
> :-) Also there may be other systems on which it does not work for other
> reasons.  I mean, if the support for user-specified command is there,
> and we don't want to remove it (do we?), then why not fix it, in
> parallel with improving signal-process?

My proposal is to remove the user-specified command, yes. There's no
need for it.

Best regards, Michael.