Re: Tree-sitter api

[Yuan Fu]

> 
> If so, I think we should have our own load-path for these
> libraries; relying on the standard LD_LIBRARY_PATH etc. is not good
> enough (although we should support that as well).  I envision that at
> least in some cases users will not want to have these libraries in the
> public places, or maybe even won't have the requisite access rights to
> do so.  We should provide Emacs-style alternatives, like some
> subdirectory of ~/.emacs.d/ and/or under ${prefix}/lib/ (similar to
> *.eln files).

Anyone have thoughts on this?

Yuan