Re: Tree-sitter api

[Yuan Fu]

> On Mar 31, 2022, at 4:00 PM, Yuan Fu <casouri@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> If so, I think we should have our own load-path for these
>> libraries; relying on the standard LD_LIBRARY_PATH etc. is not good
>> enough (although we should support that as well).  I envision that at
>> least in some cases users will not want to have these libraries in the
>> public places, or maybe even won't have the requisite access rights to
>> do so.  We should provide Emacs-style alternatives, like some
>> subdirectory of ~/.emacs.d/ and/or under ${prefix}/lib/ (similar to
>> *.eln files).
> 
> Anyone have thoughts on this?
> 
> Yuan

Sorry for the duplicate, didn’t mean to repeat myself.

Yuan