[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Ideal performance of ELisp
From: |
Andrea Corallo |
Subject: |
Re: Ideal performance of ELisp |
Date: |
Tue, 16 Aug 2022 18:24:48 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Lynn Winebarger <owinebar@gmail.com> writes:
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 4:59 AM Andrea Corallo <akrl@sdf.org> wrote:
>>
>> Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:
>>
>> >>>> Could it be possible to embed C snippets into lisp functions directly?
>> >>>> Similar to assembler snippets in C.
>> >>>
>> >>> Andrea is better placed to answer that, but I think it would be fairly
>> >>> easy to allow insertion of "C-like" snippets when the code gets compiled
>> >>> with the native compiler.
>> > I was thinking of a C-like DSL (probably with a Lisp-style syntax).
>> > Designed to be easy to translate to libgccir as well as not too hard
>> > to interpret when libgccjit is not available.
>>
>> Yep that's an option, I thought about that as well, not sure how much
>> practical it is tho. One of the downside is that we could not consume
>> nor provide any of the existing C header files.
>
> Ugh. Why not inline LAP blocks?
You could inline LAP or even LIMPLE relatively easily but I don't see
any perf opportunity to take advantage from in doing that.
- Re: Ideal performance of ELisp, (continued)
- Re: Ideal performance of ELisp, Stefan Monnier, 2022/08/14
- Re: Ideal performance of ELisp, Andrea Corallo, 2022/08/16
- Re: Ideal performance of ELisp, Ihor Radchenko, 2022/08/16
- Re: Ideal performance of ELisp, Andrea Corallo, 2022/08/16
- Re: Ideal performance of ELisp, Ihor Radchenko, 2022/08/17
- Re: Ideal performance of ELisp, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/08/17
- Re: Ideal performance of ELisp, Lynn Winebarger, 2022/08/16
- Re: Ideal performance of ELisp,
Andrea Corallo <=
- Re: Ideal performance of ELisp, Lynn Winebarger, 2022/08/17
- Re: Ideal performance of ELisp, Andrea Corallo, 2022/08/17
- Re: Ideal performance of ELisp, Lynn Winebarger, 2022/08/18
- Re: Why tree-sitter instead of Semantic? (was Re: CC Mode with font-lock-maximum-decoration 2), Akib Azmain Turja, 2022/08/12
- Re: Why tree-sitter instead of Semantic? (was Re: CC Mode with font-lock-maximum-decoration 2), tomas, 2022/08/12
- Re: Why tree-sitter instead of Semantic? (was Re: CC Mode with font-lock-maximum-decoration 2), Akib Azmain Turja, 2022/08/13
- Re: Why tree-sitter instead of Semantic? (was Re: CC Mode with font-lock-maximum-decoration 2), tomas, 2022/08/13
- Re: Why tree-sitter instead of Semantic? (was Re: CC Mode with font-lock-maximum-decoration 2), Lynn Winebarger, 2022/08/13
- Re: Why tree-sitter instead of Semantic? (was Re: CC Mode with font-lock-maximum-decoration 2), Akib Azmain Turja, 2022/08/13
- Re: Why tree-sitter instead of Semantic? (was Re: CC Mode with font-lock-maximum-decoration 2), Eric Ludlam, 2022/08/14