Re: Renaming eglot -- or at least add an alias?

[Philip Kaludercic]

Philip Kaludercic <philipk@posteo.net> writes:

> Tim Cross <theophilusx@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> writes:
>>
>>> Can anyone suggest a way to describe the job that Eglot does, NOT
>>> using technical jargon, or implementation details such as "LSP"?
>
> Some ideas of the top of my head:
>
> - ide-mode
> - integrated-development-mode
> - {smart,intelligent,clever}-mode
> - programming-mode
> - syntax-mode

I know it is too late now, but another idea might just be
"polygot"/"polygot-mode".  Has some language connotation, close to
"Eglot" and is a real word.