[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: noverlay branch
From: |
Gerd Möllmann |
Subject: |
Re: noverlay branch |
Date: |
Fri, 07 Oct 2022 17:12:04 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:
> Then I don't see how it would be a "ready-made complete solution"
> because it doesn't seem easy to make such updates lazily "from the
> outside".
I was anwering the context of the whole thread on the bug list, which
partly landed on emacs-devel. Where "tree" meant what we talked about
implementing a successor function instead of a stateful stack that was
being used at the time, and so on, and so on.
Whatever.
- Re: noverlay branch, Matt Armstrong, 2022/10/06
- Re: noverlay branch, Gerd Möllmann, 2022/10/06
- Re: noverlay branch, Matt Armstrong, 2022/10/07
- Re: noverlay branch, Gerd Möllmann, 2022/10/07
- Re: noverlay branch, Stefan Monnier, 2022/10/07
- Re: noverlay branch, Gerd Möllmann, 2022/10/07
- Re: noverlay branch, Stefan Monnier, 2022/10/07
- Re: noverlay branch,
Gerd Möllmann <=
- Re: noverlay branch, Stefan Monnier, 2022/10/07
- Re: noverlay branch, Stefan Monnier, 2022/10/07
- Re: noverlay branch, Matt Armstrong, 2022/10/07
- Re: noverlay branch, Matt Armstrong, 2022/10/07
Re: noverlay branch, Stefan Monnier, 2022/10/06