[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: noverlay branch
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: noverlay branch |
Date: |
Sun, 09 Oct 2022 11:34:01 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
>> node->otick = otick;
>
> Indeed, I saw later in the remove code that we do propagate offsets
> without caring if they're up-to-date, and I think the logic behind that
> is sound. And indeed we can drop the test because the only property we
> only ever care about for an `otick` is whether it's equal to
> `tree->otick`, so if node->parent->otick != otick then performing the
> assignment is equivalent to not performing it.
The above isn't quite right:
I was thinking of `node->otick = parent->otick`.
Stefan
- Re: noverlay branch, (continued)
- Re: noverlay branch, Stefan Monnier, 2022/10/06
- Re: noverlay branch, Matt Armstrong, 2022/10/06
- Re: noverlay branch, Matt Armstrong, 2022/10/07
- Re: noverlay branch, Stefan Monnier, 2022/10/07
- Re: noverlay branch, Matt Armstrong, 2022/10/08
- Re: noverlay branch, Matt Armstrong, 2022/10/08
- Re: noverlay branch, Stefan Monnier, 2022/10/09
- Re: noverlay branch,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: noverlay branch, Matt Armstrong, 2022/10/09
- Re: noverlay branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/10/10
- Re: noverlay branch, Matt Armstrong, 2022/10/10
- Re: noverlay branch, Stefan Monnier, 2022/10/10
- Re: noverlay branch, Matt Armstrong, 2022/10/10
- Re: noverlay branch, Stefan Monnier, 2022/10/11
- Re: noverlay branch, Matt Armstrong, 2022/10/11
- Re: noverlay branch, Stefan Monnier, 2022/10/11
- Re: noverlay branch, Matt Armstrong, 2022/10/12
- Re: noverlay branch, Stefan Monnier, 2022/10/12