[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Average-user-facing interface for tree-sitter
From: |
Robert Pluim |
Subject: |
Re: Average-user-facing interface for tree-sitter |
Date: |
Thu, 13 Oct 2022 11:42:07 +0200 |
>>>>> On Thu, 13 Oct 2022 17:32:33 +0800, Po Lu <luangruo@yahoo.com> said:
Po Lu> Robert Pluim <rpluim@gmail.com> writes:
>> off-by-two: thereʼs also the "I want syntax highlighting and
>> indentation to work out of the box, donʼt bother me with
>> implementation details" camp, which kind of implies that we should
>> turn on tree-sitter by default if itʼs available.
Po Lu> That's camp 1.
How can they know the want tree-sitter everywhere if they donʼt want
to be bothered with how syntax highlighting and indentation are
achieved? Anyway, the taxonomy of potential tree-sitter users is not
important
Po Lu> I fall somewhere in between. My hope is that Emacs and major modes
will
Po Lu> still support being run without tree-sitter.
I think that will be true, but suspect the non-tree-sitter experience
will not keep up.
Robert
--